It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample Answer 1
As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been too common for most people, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe this development has far more drawbacks. The first one is that travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared. For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects people's health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk of being attacked by animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like only scientists and rich people can afford this activity, so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas outweigh its advantages.
Sample Answer 2
Travelling to such places as the poles seemed to be unthinkable a few centuries ago. Now both scientists and tourists can do it, but is it a positive achievement? - I doubt it, and I am going to explain why.
When Roald Amundsen reached the South Pole and set up a Norwegian flag there, the whole world admired his courage and determination. Captain Scott and his team were less successful and unfortunately none of his companions managed to come back. The captain’s diaries and letters to his unborn son cannot be read without tears and compassion. These are two remarkable examples of inner strength and unbroken spirit which cannot be underestimated.
There is no doubt that a lot of things have become more affordable for the past decades. Nevertheless travelling to remote natural environments need to be prepared thoroughly. The ways of transport like snowmobiles cannot be compared with dog sledges or skates. Tourists do not need to have food depots, they can transport all the food, clothes and necessary equipment with them. I am convinced that seeing all the untouched beauty of the nature will leave everyone speechless as this beauty can hardly be expressed by words.
We must acknowledge that people do more harm to the nature wherever they appear. We cannot deny that Everest has become a greatest dump “thanks to” all the tourists who climb it. They all are looking for excitement and new experience, but what is left behind them? I am convinced that such places as the South and North poles should become ecological reserves and their activity has to be supervised by the government and environmental organizations. There are other numerous ways of searching the information except visiting the places. Ecotourism should be restricted as well because thousands of species of animals have been disappeared for ever.
Overall, tourism to distant places does great harm to the environment. The governments should take measures to protect the habitat of rare animals and plants from people.
Sample Answer 3
Remote natural places have become attractive to scientists and tourists these days. However, whether the trend will have negative influence on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches. This is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.
Moreover, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which can not be compared to other places they have been to. This could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature, such as the South Pole which can not be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.
That is not to say that there is no drawbacks of the practise. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere. Consequently the loss will be immense.
In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors; meanwhile, these new comers need to restrict their behaviours. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.
Sample Answer 4
Since ancient times, Planet earth is known to host a multitude of natural resources, scenic beauty, polar ice caps, mountain ranges, hidden terrains and so on. Often Scientists and tourists travel all over the earth to explore hidden natural place, admire their beauty or conduct scientific researches over its ecosystem. This essay will analyse the merits and demerits associated with these explorations before drawing a logical conclusion.
One of the benefits of exploring distant natural ecosystem by scientist and sightseer is to study the local inhabitants, flora and fauna and impact of climatic changes in that region over time. Scientists can perform their research work which can potentially lead to some important discoveries about the evolution of life on earth, climatic behaviour and so on. Analysis of snow caps in Polar Regions, rivers in Arizona, lakes in Himalaya's and soil in remote forests can help to answer unsolved mysteries. Tourists can enjoy the untouched beauty of that region, relax their souls and enjoy their vacations. For instance, many holidaymakers prefer to choose sites that are not crowded and far away from known places, so that they can enjoy the nature to its full extent and revive their souls.
On the contrary, these explorations often incur huge expenses. People visiting remote places can risk their lives in danger due to unavailability of basic necessities of life like food, water, medicines and so on. Moreover, unknown environmental and climatic changes can have adverse effects on their lives. These explorations might attract more tourists which will destroy its beauty and ecosystem of local in-habitats.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides several plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, in my opinion, advantages outweigh the disadvantages as the exploration not only result in important discoveries but it also helps kerb the human desire for adventure and thrill.
Sample Answer 1
As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been too common for most people, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe this development has far more drawbacks. The first one is that travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared. For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects people's health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk of being attacked by animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like only scientists and rich people can afford this activity, so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas outweigh its advantages.
Sample Answer 2
Travelling to such places as the poles seemed to be unthinkable a few centuries ago. Now both scientists and tourists can do it, but is it a positive achievement? - I doubt it, and I am going to explain why.
When Roald Amundsen reached the South Pole and set up a Norwegian flag there, the whole world admired his courage and determination. Captain Scott and his team were less successful and unfortunately none of his companions managed to come back. The captain’s diaries and letters to his unborn son cannot be read without tears and compassion. These are two remarkable examples of inner strength and unbroken spirit which cannot be underestimated.
There is no doubt that a lot of things have become more affordable for the past decades. Nevertheless travelling to remote natural environments need to be prepared thoroughly. The ways of transport like snowmobiles cannot be compared with dog sledges or skates. Tourists do not need to have food depots, they can transport all the food, clothes and necessary equipment with them. I am convinced that seeing all the untouched beauty of the nature will leave everyone speechless as this beauty can hardly be expressed by words.
We must acknowledge that people do more harm to the nature wherever they appear. We cannot deny that Everest has become a greatest dump “thanks to” all the tourists who climb it. They all are looking for excitement and new experience, but what is left behind them? I am convinced that such places as the South and North poles should become ecological reserves and their activity has to be supervised by the government and environmental organizations. There are other numerous ways of searching the information except visiting the places. Ecotourism should be restricted as well because thousands of species of animals have been disappeared for ever.
Overall, tourism to distant places does great harm to the environment. The governments should take measures to protect the habitat of rare animals and plants from people.
Sample Answer 3
Remote natural places have become attractive to scientists and tourists these days. However, whether the trend will have negative influence on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches. This is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.
Moreover, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which can not be compared to other places they have been to. This could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature, such as the South Pole which can not be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.
That is not to say that there is no drawbacks of the practise. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere. Consequently the loss will be immense.
In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors; meanwhile, these new comers need to restrict their behaviours. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.
Sample Answer 4
Since ancient times, Planet earth is known to host a multitude of natural resources, scenic beauty, polar ice caps, mountain ranges, hidden terrains and so on. Often Scientists and tourists travel all over the earth to explore hidden natural place, admire their beauty or conduct scientific researches over its ecosystem. This essay will analyse the merits and demerits associated with these explorations before drawing a logical conclusion.
One of the benefits of exploring distant natural ecosystem by scientist and sightseer is to study the local inhabitants, flora and fauna and impact of climatic changes in that region over time. Scientists can perform their research work which can potentially lead to some important discoveries about the evolution of life on earth, climatic behaviour and so on. Analysis of snow caps in Polar Regions, rivers in Arizona, lakes in Himalaya's and soil in remote forests can help to answer unsolved mysteries. Tourists can enjoy the untouched beauty of that region, relax their souls and enjoy their vacations. For instance, many holidaymakers prefer to choose sites that are not crowded and far away from known places, so that they can enjoy the nature to its full extent and revive their souls.
On the contrary, these explorations often incur huge expenses. People visiting remote places can risk their lives in danger due to unavailability of basic necessities of life like food, water, medicines and so on. Moreover, unknown environmental and climatic changes can have adverse effects on their lives. These explorations might attract more tourists which will destroy its beauty and ecosystem of local in-habitats.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides several plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, in my opinion, advantages outweigh the disadvantages as the exploration not only result in important discoveries but it also helps kerb the human desire for adventure and thrill.
Sample Answer 5
As remote natural places that are expected to abound in variety of beautiful natural landscapes and resources are open and reachable to scientists and tourists now, there are some people that oppose such trend and claim its demerits. At some level, however, I still believe in this development does more good than harm.
First, it helps explore natural resources to be better of our lives. Any kind of resources, from oil to copper, are getting scarcer in recent decades as the increasing demand of rapidly developing economies as well exhausted excavation. In this condition, only these distant regions where they are rich in all sorts of mineral resources but still not be set foot in can keep satisfying our social advance. For instance, South Pole is known as the container of huge coal and gas reserve which can be exploited to cater for the use for all human beings and solve some extreme resources urgency in the globe.
In addition, people are given precious access to better know the earth and appreciate the beauty of nature. Love is based on understanding from the bottom of heart, which explains why city dwellers cannot treat our earth in a friendly way as they even haven’t see it as a whole. Only with the chance to sightsee these places in person can they raise the awareness of their identity as an earthling after marveling at the mystery of the nature and the happiness of harmonious communication between human and nature when they travel.
However, it should be noticed that the more people get into the distant unspoiled places, the more problems may be caused, especially in terms of local ecosystems. The environment that is untouched before in an original status is more fragile, which can be affected by over exploited and land-based resort activities.
To conclude, I approve that scientists and tourists’ visit can help tap potential natural resources and ensure more people have the chances to appreciate the beautiful scenes, only if they could travel responsibly and conserve the environment and improve the well-being of local people.
Sample Answer 6
As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. Both the advantages and disadvantages of this trend will be thoroughly discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Going to other cities or countries has been too common for most people, so it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe there are some drawbacks of this development. The first one is that travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared. For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects people's health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk of being attacked by animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like only scientists and rich people can afford this activity, so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas outweigh its advantages, and this is a negative development.
Sample Answer 7
It is commonly believed that visiting to isolated natural locations like the North Pole and the Amazon is a very unique experience not only for a research approach but also for a tourism purpose. I believe that as long as all visitors pay more attention to environment issues during their stay, the advantages of traveling such areas outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, it is generally said that the remote natural places always attract many scientists regarding their study in terms of ecosystem, global warming and other subjects. It helps expand their knowledge by collecting data and samples, and give them opportunities to figure out problems what mankind is facing nowadays such as climate change.
Secondly, remote natural areas are usually known for natural resources, oil, gas and minerals, hence it is essential for researchers to gather accurate information from there in order to manage and develop the resources for human beings' future. In this regards, scientists should take this advantage to accomplish their investigation for mankind.
Furthermore, tourists can also benefit from the current trend as they can experience extraordinary scenery compared with other views they have ever seen. There is no doubt that it is worth a visit such undeveloped tourism places because the chance can offer only once in a life time experience.
However, the most concern from the government and local authorities is that an increase in the number of visitors causes more environmental problems. It is obvious that more buildings for accommodations and restaurants are to be built to serve travellers and this will consequently lead to environmental issues like air pollution and rubbish disposal.
In conclusion, as previously stated, access to remote natural locations provide more benefits to human beings. Therefore, people must be aware of the importance of environment at first in the region.
Sample Answer 8
It is true that humans can now set foot in wild regions far away from civilisation. While I accept that this development can have certain benefits for the human race, I believe that it is likely to have a harmful impact on nature.
On the one hand, undertaking expeditions to the wilderness can be valuable in terms of both science and recreation. There are a considerable number of undiscovered secrets that can be tremendously useful for researchers to conduct their studies. For instance, environmental scientists can analyse the data about the thickness of ice layers over millions of years in both hemispheres to predict the possible changes in global temperatures. Such findings are crucial for the governments to develop appropriate plans to alleviate global warming. Furthermore, the untouched beauty of these areas is usually appealing to travellers, providing people with an attractive option of holiday destination or excursion.
However, I would argue that these positive aspects are outweighed by the drawbacks. When people are given full and easy access to the distant and unpopulated areas, there are likely to be more moving there to reside or start their business. It has been shown that substantial damage has been done to nature such as massive deforestation or water contamination due to humans’ lack of environmental awareness. If there is inadequate protection of the environment from this type of action, wild regions in the world will no longer exist, unspeakably affecting not only the overall ecology but also the lives of other people.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of travelling to wild environments are more significant than the possible benefits for the mentioned reasons.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions:
• isolated: far away from any others
Example: isolated rural areas
• common: happening often, existing in large numbers or in many
Example: Jackson is a common English name.
• adverse: negative and unpleasant
Example: Lack of money will have an adverse effect on our research program.
• ensure: to make sure that something happens or is definite
Example: The book ensured his success.
• Appealing (adj): attractive or interesting
Example: Overseas students who are offered an appealing salary and position in a foreign company are usually unable to resist the offer and choose to remain in the country instead of returning to their native land.
• Distant (adj): far away
Example: The appilication of technology in the form of electric household appliances has facilitate the enjoyment of people’s life to a great extent..
• Unpopulated (adj): having no inhabitants
Example: Jackson is a common English name.
• Reside (v): to live, have your home, or stay in a place
Example: The huge waves of immigrants from poorer countries flocking to wealthier nations can threaten to take the jobs of those who have resided in their countries for a long time by accepting to work for a much lower pay.
• Substantial (adj): large in size, value or importance
Example: By respecting the substantial differences between the older and the younger generations, the mutual understanding between them can be greatly enhanced.
• Massive deforestation (noun phrase): the destruction of forests by people on a large scale
Example: Massive deforestation is largely attributable to massive deforestation because there are not enough trees to help to hold the flood water.
• Contamination (n): the action of making something less pure or poisonous.
Example: In many rural villages in China and Vietnam, the supply of underground water which has been in use for hundreds of years is now incapable of meeting the growing demand of the expanding population, threatening the health of the people with using water which has not been tested for contamination.
• Environmental awareness (noun phrase): the understanding that the environment needs to be protected
Example: The first step to environmental protection is concerned with raising the environmental awareness of individuals.
• Ecology (n): the relationships between the air, land, water, animals, etc
Example: Oil spills cause terrible damage to the fragile ecology of the sea.
Sample Answer 8
It is true that humans can now set foot in wild regions far away from civilisation. While I accept that this development can have certain benefits for the human race, I believe that it is likely to have a harmful impact on nature.
On the one hand, undertaking expeditions to the wilderness can be valuable in terms of both science and recreation. There are a considerable number of undiscovered secrets that can be tremendously useful for researchers to conduct their studies. For instance, environmental scientists can analyse the data about the thickness of ice layers over millions of years in both hemispheres to predict the possible changes in global temperatures. Such findings are crucial for the governments to develop appropriate plans to alleviate global warming. Furthermore, the untouched beauty of these areas is usually appealing to travellers, providing people with an attractive option of holiday destination or excursion.
However, I would argue that these positive aspects are outweighed by the drawbacks. When people are given full and easy access to the distant and unpopulated areas, there are likely to be more moving there to reside or start their business. It has been shown that substantial damage has been done to nature such as massive deforestation or water contamination due to humans’ lack of environmental awareness. If there is inadequate protection of the environment from this type of action, wild regions in the world will no longer exist, unspeakably affecting not only the overall ecology but also the lives of other people.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of travelling to wild environments are more significant than the possible benefits for the mentioned reasons.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions:
• isolated: far away from any others
Example: isolated rural areas
• common: happening often, existing in large numbers or in many
Example: Jackson is a common English name.
• adverse: negative and unpleasant
Example: Lack of money will have an adverse effect on our research program.
• ensure: to make sure that something happens or is definite
Example: The book ensured his success.
• Appealing (adj): attractive or interesting
Example: Overseas students who are offered an appealing salary and position in a foreign company are usually unable to resist the offer and choose to remain in the country instead of returning to their native land.
• Distant (adj): far away
Example: The appilication of technology in the form of electric household appliances has facilitate the enjoyment of people’s life to a great extent..
• Unpopulated (adj): having no inhabitants
Example: Jackson is a common English name.
• Reside (v): to live, have your home, or stay in a place
Example: The huge waves of immigrants from poorer countries flocking to wealthier nations can threaten to take the jobs of those who have resided in their countries for a long time by accepting to work for a much lower pay.
• Substantial (adj): large in size, value or importance
Example: By respecting the substantial differences between the older and the younger generations, the mutual understanding between them can be greatly enhanced.
• Massive deforestation (noun phrase): the destruction of forests by people on a large scale
Example: Massive deforestation is largely attributable to massive deforestation because there are not enough trees to help to hold the flood water.
• Contamination (n): the action of making something less pure or poisonous.
Example: In many rural villages in China and Vietnam, the supply of underground water which has been in use for hundreds of years is now incapable of meeting the growing demand of the expanding population, threatening the health of the people with using water which has not been tested for contamination.
• Environmental awareness (noun phrase): the understanding that the environment needs to be protected
Example: The first step to environmental protection is concerned with raising the environmental awareness of individuals.
• Ecology (n): the relationships between the air, land, water, animals, etc
Example: Oil spills cause terrible damage to the fragile ecology of the sea.
Komentar
Posting Komentar