Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want.
Ini merupakan salah satu contoh task 2 IELTS Writing Test dan berikut merupakan sample answernya.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer 1
People have different views about whether noise should be limited. While some individuals believe the level of noise being created should be strictly controlled, I would argue that people should have the right to produce noise if they want to.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government should control the amount of noise produced. The first reason is that too much noise can significantly affect people's health. Living in a place that is too noisy can cause problems such as headaches, which can decrease the health levels of people, especially old ones. Additionally, noise can disturb people's work or study. For example, a university student will not be able to concentrate on his preparation for exams if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
However, I believe people should be allowed make as much noise as they want because of some reasons. Firstly, producing noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activities. For instance, singing or cheering for a football club can be relaxing, and everyone has the right to do those things. Secondly, as the world is becoming more modern, people have found ways to deal with the problem of noise. Scientists have invented walls and windows that can block out the noise, which allows individuals to focus on their work without being disturbed. Therefore, the problem of noise can be reduced and there is no need for people to keep quiet.
In conclusion, while many people believe there should be controls about noise, I believe we have the right to create noise when we want to.
Sample Answer 2
It took centuries for the inhabitants of planet earth to transform into a civilised society. Norms and traditions that were earlier considered to be of great value are gradually replaced with modern etiquette and manners. Being a citizen of democratic society one has the right to act and express as per their likings such as making noise, but many people believe that freedom of expression in high decibel should be regulated. This essay will analyse both views before presenting an opinion.
On the one hand, people argue that they are free to do and act whatever they like. Proponents of this view point say that this is their fundamental right and make noise or live peacefully should be the sole preference of an individual. For instance, in sporting events, like football, the decibels are at their highest peak or celebrations like birthday parties at home where children shout on the top of their voice to make their presence felt. Moreover, clattering depends on the situation also, for instance, patient's attendants in third world countries shout on the administration staff and make noise if they are overcharged on their bills. They believe that by shouting they can suppress another party.
On the contrary, another school of thought believes that one should live peacefully and respect the rights of their neighbour, passersby, and dwellers and so on. They say that people should always raise their concerns with politeness and softness in attitude. Proponents of this view point don't argue that noise in the form of music or parties should be regulated and the government should define laws and policies to kerb it because they distract and discomfort individuals who are sick, studying or sleeping and so on. For instance, in theUK one can be jailed if found disturbing their neighbour through loud music or quarrel.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides solid arguments in favour of both views. I personally believe that noise levels by an individual should be strongly regulated through legislatures in residential areas, hospitals, libraries and so on. However, one should be allowed to enjoy and make noise in sporting arena's, parks etc.
Sample Answer 8
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer 1
People have different views about whether noise should be limited. While some individuals believe the level of noise being created should be strictly controlled, I would argue that people should have the right to produce noise if they want to.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government should control the amount of noise produced. The first reason is that too much noise can significantly affect people's health. Living in a place that is too noisy can cause problems such as headaches, which can decrease the health levels of people, especially old ones. Additionally, noise can disturb people's work or study. For example, a university student will not be able to concentrate on his preparation for exams if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
However, I believe people should be allowed make as much noise as they want because of some reasons. Firstly, producing noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activities. For instance, singing or cheering for a football club can be relaxing, and everyone has the right to do those things. Secondly, as the world is becoming more modern, people have found ways to deal with the problem of noise. Scientists have invented walls and windows that can block out the noise, which allows individuals to focus on their work without being disturbed. Therefore, the problem of noise can be reduced and there is no need for people to keep quiet.
In conclusion, while many people believe there should be controls about noise, I believe we have the right to create noise when we want to.
Sample Answer 2
It took centuries for the inhabitants of planet earth to transform into a civilised society. Norms and traditions that were earlier considered to be of great value are gradually replaced with modern etiquette and manners. Being a citizen of democratic society one has the right to act and express as per their likings such as making noise, but many people believe that freedom of expression in high decibel should be regulated. This essay will analyse both views before presenting an opinion.
On the one hand, people argue that they are free to do and act whatever they like. Proponents of this view point say that this is their fundamental right and make noise or live peacefully should be the sole preference of an individual. For instance, in sporting events, like football, the decibels are at their highest peak or celebrations like birthday parties at home where children shout on the top of their voice to make their presence felt. Moreover, clattering depends on the situation also, for instance, patient's attendants in third world countries shout on the administration staff and make noise if they are overcharged on their bills. They believe that by shouting they can suppress another party.
On the contrary, another school of thought believes that one should live peacefully and respect the rights of their neighbour, passersby, and dwellers and so on. They say that people should always raise their concerns with politeness and softness in attitude. Proponents of this view point don't argue that noise in the form of music or parties should be regulated and the government should define laws and policies to kerb it because they distract and discomfort individuals who are sick, studying or sleeping and so on. For instance, in theUK one can be jailed if found disturbing their neighbour through loud music or quarrel.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides solid arguments in favour of both views. I personally believe that noise levels by an individual should be strongly regulated through legislatures in residential areas, hospitals, libraries and so on. However, one should be allowed to enjoy and make noise in sporting arena's, parks etc.
Sample Answer 3
It is often considered by many that they can make noises as per their wish, while other people believe that there should have strict rules to control the amount of noise individual makes. In my opinion, I think noise pollution causes ample social and physical issues, hence it should be controlled.
On the one hand, freedom to speak and making noise is one of the human rights. In other words, every citizen has a right to make sounds or noise as they prefer. For instance, in some special events such as birthday celebrations, dancing parties making noise is accepted in the current society. Moreover, making sounds is often considered as accepted behaviour especially among small children. Making noise provides enjoyment among people obviously during joyful occasions. It helps to ventilate one’s emotions, particularly anger and sorrow.
On the other hand, noise pollution is often accepted as one of the major concerns of the current world due to several drawbacks. Firstly, unpleasant sound causes ample health issues. For example, the high-intensity sound could cause increased stress level, deafness, cardiovascular problems and even sleep disturbances. Secondly, noise would often affect wild life. Animals would probably develop aggressive behaviour and get irritated due to the high-frequency of unpleasant sounds. To cite an example, during thunder and lightning pet animals became frustrated as a result of high pitch sounds. Finally, it leads to trouble communicating. In other sense, communication between individuals becomes difficult owing to noise from the surrounding. In other words, communication gets distracted.
In conclusion, the noise would adversely affect society and one’s body .Hence, necessary steps to be taken to control it. In my opinion, people should abide rules to control noise formation for the welfare of the society and inhabitants.
Sample Answer 4
People have many different views about noise. Some people think that we should have some essential measures to reduce noise due to its negative impacts, while others think that there is no rule in making noise, so we can make noise as much as we want. I personally believe that both views have particular reasons about noise.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people like to make noise. Firstly, many people feel comfortable and concentrate on some various activities such as working and entertaining. For example, some of the people usually relax by listening music with the maximum volume of speakers to enjoy their favourite songs after a hard-working day even though they know, by doing this, it could disturb next-door neighbours. Secondly, some people think that noise is a part of the industrialisation and the modernisation processes, it, therefore, could not be avoided. Most of the urban citizens were perhaps familiar with traffic noise. Thus, they may argue that there is no reason to limit noise.
On the other hand, it could be beneficial in some ways if we have some strict controls about noise. Living in a place with too much noise could lead to some harmful impacts to their health. Some of my friends told me that they had no healthy sleep because of intrusive sounds from a nearby factory. If this situation lasts for a long time, it will lead to a deterioration in their mental and physical health. In addition, the productive of work can be reduced as a consequence of noise. Many workers complain that they cannot concentrate on their tasks because of constant noise from vehicles in the street.
In conclusion, it seems to me noise should be diminished to have a better life, even though some people insist on making a lot of noise without consideration for others.
Sample Answer 5
Nowadays, an increasing number of people around the world are concerned about noise issue in any public place. Some people state that some essential measures should be applied to control noise, others believe that they have freedom to make as much noise as they want. I totally agree that it is would be better to reduce noise.
On one hand, it is clear that it is more beneficial to impose some laws to strict control noise which has negative consequence to both their work and life. This means that noise has harmful impact on people health, particular in metal and physical health. Therefore, it is necessary for all people to need to minimize noise as possible.
Moreover, productivity of work may be reduced by consequence of noise. For example, most of staff who permanently work in workshop, have to suffer the constant noise from vehicles in the streets, this make them not to fully focus on their task.
On the other hand, there are many reasons that people like to make as much noise as they like. Of course, many people feel more comfortable and free when making noise while working or entertaining. In addition, people argue that noise is as a part of modernization process therefore it is unavoidable so traffic noise seems to have become more familiar to urban citizens.
In conclusion, I still believe that the reduction noise will make life become better, although some people insist on making a lot of noise without any consideration for others.
Sample Answer 6
Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The problem of noise pollution is currently increasing in the modern society. While some individuals believe the levels of noise being created should be strictly controlled, I would argue that people should have the right to produce noise if they want to.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government should control the amount of noise produced. The first reason is that too much noise can significantly affect people's health. Living in a place that is too noisy can cause problems such as headaches, which can decrease the health levels of people, especially old ones. Additionally, noise can disturb people's work or study. For example, a university student will not be able to concentrate on his preparation for exams if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
On the other hand, I believe people can make as much noise as they want because of some reasons. Firstly, producing noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activities. For instance, singing or cheering for a football club can be relaxing, and everyone has the right to do those things. Secondly, as the world is becoming more modern, people have found ways to deal with the problem of noise. Scientists have invented walls and windows that can block out the noise, which allows individuals to focus on their work without being disturbed. Therefore, the problem of noise can be reduced and there is no need for people to keep quiet.
In conclusion, while there are reasons why the levels of noise should be limited, I believe people should have the right to make noise.
Sample Answer 7
It has long been a controversy around the noise restriction. Some people prefer to have tranquil and placid atmosphere without any noise. However, others argue that they can make any kinds of loquacious sound. Although there are some evidences advocating the freedom in making noise, I think that there should be noise limitation.
On one hand, making noise freely has good outcomes. Firstly, some scientists have proved that the sound waves trigger the creativity area in the brand. The louder one hears the sound , the more creative they can be. Moreover, the scientists suggests that exposure of infants to Beethoven or Mozart’s songs is benefit for the children in their early life and in the future. They claim that not only does the music mollify the newborns’ hunger but it also flourishes the intelligence of the youth. Secondly, being able to make noise alleviate human’s stress from arduous tasks they have to suffer from. When listening to their auspicious music, people feel calm and relaxed. Yelling at somebody that people despite alleviate their anger. Some experts also regard that living in the quiet places can cause human with phobias.
On the other hand, the restrictions in noise should be made for better human life.Exposing to loud and unremitting noise can harm people by causing many illnesses . The ears is such a vulnerable organ of the body that people should protect and maintain them in healthy states .Suffering from constant noise can damage human’s hearing system, which causes deaf. Moreover, people can also suffer from heart disease , paralyzation, and headache. If it were not any strict laws that prohibit noise and the way people use it, human life would be threaten heavily.
In conclusion, the bad outcomes of the noise surpass its benefits. Therefore, governments should issues some limitation for creating noises.
Sample Answer 8
Some individuals believe the levels of noise being created should be strictly controlled, while others think people should have the right to produce noise if they want to. Both these views will be thoroughly discussed in this essay.
To begin with, there are several reasons why the government should control the amount of noise produced. The first reason is that too much noise can significantly affect people’s health. Living in a place that is too noisy can cause problems such as headaches, which can decrease the health levels of people, especially old ones. Additionally, noise can disturb people’s work or study. For example, a university student will not be able to concentrate on his preparation for exams if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
However, some people believe they can make as much noise as they want because of some reasons. Firstly, producing noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activities. For instance, singing or cheering for a football club can be relaxing, and everyone has the right to do those things. Secondly, as the world is becoming more modern, people have found ways to deal with the problem of noise. Scientists have invented walls and windows that can block out the noise, which allows individuals to focus on their work without being disturbed. Therefore, the problem of noise can be reduced and there is no need for people to keep quiet.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why people should have the right to make noise. Nevertheless, I think the levels of noise should be limited so that it will not affect other individuals.
Sample Answer 9
It is unfortunately the case that in any society we can find a number of people who do not respect to the social rights of others. One of the most disturbing cases is making noise either in public or people's private life. . While the majority of people believe that the amount of noise produced by individuals must be restricted, there are still people who think that they have freedom to make noise regardless of considering other's life. In this essay, I will explain my point of view by examining both sides of the argument.
Some people think that they should not take any responsibility related to limiting or decreasing the noise made by them. They claim that controlling the amount of the noise by rules and regulations not only invades their personal privacy, but it violates their social freedom. For example, in their view, listening to music loudly or hosting night parties in their own apartments would be considered as their basic human rights of being happy.
There is, however, a strong argument that it is the responsibility of all members of a society to respect others' social life. Most people object to disrupting other's life by making unlimited noises. They believe that making noise should be controlled as much as possible when it creates disturbance for others by regulating strict rules. A common example here is to prohibit talking over cell phones loudly in the public such as in a subway which is clearly creating disturbance for people who are near the person while it has been frequently happening.
In my view, any type of activity that creates disturbance for citizens' life must be controlled, and noise is no exception. Although it is beyond the power of governments to control all disturbing noises in the whole society, it seems to be possible that making some avoidable noises is banned in certain places such as near hospitals.
Sample Answer 10
It is often argued that the government should impose restriction on the level of noise. While reasons can be given to justify this, I would contend that individuals could just make as much noise as possible.
On the one hand, there are those who claim that controlling noise is necessary. Today life is becoming busier, putting people under huge stress and pressure. Therefore, people deserve a rest after all that hard work. The regulation of the level of noise helps us enjoy quiet life. Without this, it is hard for the government to harmonize conflicts between noise makers and noise haters. Take my sister as an example. After coming back from school, she often reads books and listens to pop music to relax.
On the other hand, I agree with those who argue that people reserve the right to make noise. Primarily, making noise is a method of relieving stress. By singing and screaming loudly or turning on the radio to the maximum level, many people feel calm and refreshed. Take the case of my neighbor. He told me that he often sang loudly in his own room whenever he felt exhausted and bored. Another justification is that it is unavoidable to be noisy for some occupations. Pianists, for example, need to practice thousands times before being able to perform well on the stage. Consequently, a state’s restriction on the noise level will retard their success.
In conclusion, it seems to me that people are freely to make noise despite the undeniable advantages of the state’s control of noise.
Sample Answer 11
There have been many arguments regarding if the noise should be strictly regulated or not. Having said that, while some people agree to the above notion, however, personally I staunchly feel that people should be allowed to choose their own noise levels.
There are many reasons behind why government should lay down heavy rules against noise. Health problems is the key factor. Extreme noise levels can affect people’s health, especially elderly’s, which could create headaches and consequently increase the stress level. Additionally, excessive noise could also hinder the concentration level of people in the neighbourhood, specifically if they are preparing for some major examinations. Despite all these reasons, there are certain ways to mitigate noise. Scientists, using modern technology, have come up with material for glasses and walls which are absolutely noise proof and obstruct any noise, whatsoever. This helps people to concentrate in their work while not being disturbed by any kind of noise.
Moreover, there are certain attributes regarding why noise levels should be a free choice. Firstly, after a long and tiring day at work, the employees choose to wind down by either going to a party or indulging in recreational activities like dancing and singing. This not only relaxes them but also takes their mind off their work which are beneficial for their health. Consequently, extreme noise levels at sports stadiums, like cheering loudly, boost the morale of the players and hence they play more effectively.
In conclusion, while there are many reasons why there should be strict regulations against noise, by undertaking proper measures, I feel that choosing the noise levels should be left on the individual itself.
Sample Answer 12
People hold different views about whether people should have the freedom to produce noise or comply with some regulations of it. In my view, it is important that noise making be put under control.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe in their rights to generate noise freely. As people these days often have to suffer from considerable stress at work or school, they tend to find an effective way to relieve it. In some cases, recreational activities such as karaoke singing or party holding can bring a certain amount of relaxation, mitigating stressful situations for everyone. If too strictly imposed, any restriction of noise may deter people from gaining access to one of the useful methods of relaxing.
However, I can understand the arguments against noise makers. Firstly, excessive levels of noise can cause serious disturbance to the nearby residents who also have the rights to take a proper rest after a tiring day. Those who are affected by the loud sounds from their neighbours may not only be unable to relax but also have their levels of discomfort increased. In the long term, this will definitely have a negative impact on their quality of life. Another reason for this opinion is that too much noise can produce detrimental effects on the health of the unintentional hearers. For example, constant exposure to high pitch noise can result in auditory problems, for example hearing loss. Hearing-impaired individuals are very likely to experience difficulty in their daily life.
In conclusion, although there are good reasons why people should be allowed to make as much noise as they wish, in my opinion some appropriate controls are necessary.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions
• To comply with sth (verb phrase): to act according to an order, set of rules, regulations or request.
Example: There should be serious pelnaties for failure to comply with the regulations of treating hazardous waste.
• To put sth under control/ To be put under control (prep phrase): to be deal with or limit sth successfully
Example: The effort of reducing overpopulation in urban cities such as Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh would require the migration of people from other areas to be put under control.
• Recreational (adj): connected with activities that people do for enjoyment when they are not working
Example: The large cities in Vietnam are widely perceived to offer a range of recreational activities and facilities which draw a number of domestic holiday makers from the neighbouring regions to relax during holiday periods.
• To impose sth on sth (verb phrase): to officially force a rule, law or something to be obeyed and received.
Example: One methods to deter alcohol consumption is imposing very high taxes on any purchases and heavy fines for illegal trades of alcohol.
• To deter sth from sth (v): to prevent someone from doing something or to make them less enthusiastic about doing it by making it more difficult for them to do it or threatening bad results if they do it.
Example: Teenage gang members can be deterred from committing crimes by means of strict punishments for all young delinquents to make an example of them.
• To gain access to sth (verb phrase): to have the right or opportunity to use something
Example: The concentration of prestigious universities and colleges in a few metropolisises is responsible for the mass annual migration of students from rural areas and smaller cities who seek access to more quality education and more widely recognised degrees.
• Excessive (adj): too much
Example: The excessive consumption of fast food with a view to saving the cooking time is prone to chronic health conditions such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
• Detrimental (adj): causing harm and damage
Example: Prolonged lack of sleep due to an overly busy timetable is known to have harmful side-effects apart from difficulty in concentration and temporary loss of memory.
• Unintentional (adj): not planned or intended
Example: Some harmful habits of parents such as reckless driving and smoking, although (they are) unintentional, can lead the children to adopt these habits when they become adults.
• Exposure to sth (noun phrase)/ To be exposed to sth (adjective phrase): the fact of experiencing sth or being affected by it
Example: The residents who live permanently in urban cities usually suffer from continuous exposure to polluted air caused by vehicle emissions; as a result, they are prone to respiratory diseases such as asthma.
Sample Answer 12
People hold different views about whether people should have the freedom to produce noise or comply with some regulations of it. In my view, it is important that noise making be put under control.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe in their rights to generate noise freely. As people these days often have to suffer from considerable stress at work or school, they tend to find an effective way to relieve it. In some cases, recreational activities such as karaoke singing or party holding can bring a certain amount of relaxation, mitigating stressful situations for everyone. If too strictly imposed, any restriction of noise may deter people from gaining access to one of the useful methods of relaxing.
However, I can understand the arguments against noise makers. Firstly, excessive levels of noise can cause serious disturbance to the nearby residents who also have the rights to take a proper rest after a tiring day. Those who are affected by the loud sounds from their neighbours may not only be unable to relax but also have their levels of discomfort increased. In the long term, this will definitely have a negative impact on their quality of life. Another reason for this opinion is that too much noise can produce detrimental effects on the health of the unintentional hearers. For example, constant exposure to high pitch noise can result in auditory problems, for example hearing loss. Hearing-impaired individuals are very likely to experience difficulty in their daily life.
In conclusion, although there are good reasons why people should be allowed to make as much noise as they wish, in my opinion some appropriate controls are necessary.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions
• To comply with sth (verb phrase): to act according to an order, set of rules, regulations or request.
Example: There should be serious pelnaties for failure to comply with the regulations of treating hazardous waste.
• To put sth under control/ To be put under control (prep phrase): to be deal with or limit sth successfully
Example: The effort of reducing overpopulation in urban cities such as Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh would require the migration of people from other areas to be put under control.
• Recreational (adj): connected with activities that people do for enjoyment when they are not working
Example: The large cities in Vietnam are widely perceived to offer a range of recreational activities and facilities which draw a number of domestic holiday makers from the neighbouring regions to relax during holiday periods.
• To impose sth on sth (verb phrase): to officially force a rule, law or something to be obeyed and received.
Example: One methods to deter alcohol consumption is imposing very high taxes on any purchases and heavy fines for illegal trades of alcohol.
• To deter sth from sth (v): to prevent someone from doing something or to make them less enthusiastic about doing it by making it more difficult for them to do it or threatening bad results if they do it.
Example: Teenage gang members can be deterred from committing crimes by means of strict punishments for all young delinquents to make an example of them.
• To gain access to sth (verb phrase): to have the right or opportunity to use something
Example: The concentration of prestigious universities and colleges in a few metropolisises is responsible for the mass annual migration of students from rural areas and smaller cities who seek access to more quality education and more widely recognised degrees.
• Excessive (adj): too much
Example: The excessive consumption of fast food with a view to saving the cooking time is prone to chronic health conditions such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
• Detrimental (adj): causing harm and damage
Example: Prolonged lack of sleep due to an overly busy timetable is known to have harmful side-effects apart from difficulty in concentration and temporary loss of memory.
• Unintentional (adj): not planned or intended
Example: Some harmful habits of parents such as reckless driving and smoking, although (they are) unintentional, can lead the children to adopt these habits when they become adults.
• Exposure to sth (noun phrase)/ To be exposed to sth (adjective phrase): the fact of experiencing sth or being affected by it
Example: The residents who live permanently in urban cities usually suffer from continuous exposure to polluted air caused by vehicle emissions; as a result, they are prone to respiratory diseases such as asthma.
Komentar
Posting Komentar