Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds.
Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Sample Answer 1
The protection of wildlife has become a frequent subject of debate with strong arguments for and against. Personally, I believe that humans are paying too much attention and allocating too many resources to this issue, as will now be explained.
Firstly, if we allow any species to disappear, this is actually not a disaster. Some people may argue that the biology will be seriously affected if birds and wild animals are on the verge of extinction, but this is an exaggeration. Fossil evidence suggests that the mass disappearance of the dinosaur did not cause any harm to other species on the Earth but merely triggered the emergence of others such as the mammal. Therefore, we should not devote too much attention to the protection of wildlife.
Secondly, public money is limited. This means that the national budget should be allocated to more urgent issues rather than expending too much in the conservation of wild animals and birds. For example, more resources should be diverted to medical research to find out remedies for fatal diseases such as HIV and cancer, which may help to save thousands of lives in society.
Finally, the government can simply protect wildlife by continuing campaigns to raise public awareness of the protection of wildlife habitats, or impose stricter punishments on activities that may harm wild animals. Any individual who hunts wildlife for food or for pleasure should be given a heavy fine, and this may discourage them from threatening the life of wild animals.
In conclusion, while I do not refute the argument for the conservation of wildlife, I believe that it should attract less attention and fewer resources from the public.
Sample Answer 2
It is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds attract too much concerns and utilize many resources of society. Personally, I completely agreed with this idea.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why many people have paid too much attention to protect wild animals and birds. Firstly, many non-government organizations are built and expanded which express deep concern for almost animal species in a way quite unnecessarily. For instance, an animal protection organization accused Katy Perry of using the image of tigers in her own music video “ road” for commercial purposes while she did not. Secondary, nowadays the information about protecting animal receives more concerns in social network. Therefore, when a bear is hunted or suffered, immediately the news spread quickly throughout Facebook or others even though they are not aware of reasons.
On the other hand, people also have spent too many resources preserving wild birds. Any projects which are set up to save and take care for wild birds require a large amount of money. For instance, to find out a suitable DNA to protect wild birds seem quite hard, and obviously, the more difficult they meet, the more money they pay. Besides, a huge investments in wild animals and birds is quite unnecessary in some cases. Instead of spending money on such plans, people should invest in projects such as school, hospital or charity organization.
In conclusion, I would certainly agreed that many resources and attention are focused on the projection of wild animals and birds.
Sample Answer 3
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
Sample Answer 6
It has been a debatable topic that whether people should invest more money and resources in animal conservation today. Some suggest that the expenditure and resources should be spent on human society and to solve social problems. In my point of view, the investment in wildlife protection will always be worthwhile. The reasons are as follows.
Animal species have been vanishing at a much faster rate for about a century now due to human factors such as pollution, commercial overexploitation, poaching and deforestation. It doesn't matter that an animal is ugly to look at, undesirable or potentially dangerous, all animals play a role in nature and have a right to survive. Besides, different species of plants and animals make up the biodiversity within ecosystems, and everything in nature is connected. By protecting endangered animals we ensure not only their survival but also the biodiversity that is necessary for the ecological health of the planet.
Economically, there are millions individuals spend billions of dollars a year to practice "nature" activities such as mountain hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, photography, bird watching and visit to zoos or nature centers. What's more, thousands of people earn their living from flora and fauna. There's also the tourism industry, which attracts many travelers thanks to the beauty of its forests, the splendor of its mountains and the majesty of its lakes and rivers. If we do not make any effort to preserve endangered animals, the beauty of nature will be gone as well.
Furthermore, the will to protect animals and nature in general demonstrates the value of a society. And if the optimal development of our resources is a priority, it must be achieved not only economically or socially, but environmentally as well. This is the vision of sustainable development, which dictates that we use our natural resources wisely for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations.
In conclude, we must step up efforts to conserve animals and birds not only to keep the ecological balance but also to ensure that our grandchildren, like ourselves, will have the opportunity to enjoy nature in all its glory.
Sample Answer 7
Some people argue that governments and international non-governmental organizations have spent too much effort in the conservation of wildlife and birds. I strongly disagree with the idea and I would argue that protecting the existence of wildlife is also saving the earth where human are inhabiting in.
To begin with, it is obvious that wild animals play as indispensable role in biology balance which distributes our living environment. The lack of any species will lead to the loss of the balance which harms our lives. Thus, the reserves designing to protect endangered species are essential. One animal living in the wild is a link of a big chain that if one link is disappeared, the whole chain will be affected. For example, if the tiny organisms which are the main food of whales to be extinct, the whale eventually will be dead because of shortened sources of food.
In addition, the main reason threatens the wild definitely is human activities in the economy, construction, and beauty sectors. Human should be responsible for destroying animals’ habitat and hunting rare animals. In fact, the conservation job would be much easier if human concern more about the environment instead of doing harmful activities to the wild because of profit. For example, illegal wildlife trafficking hunt elephant for its valuable ivory which can be sold with a high price in the shadow market. To prevent this illegal action, effort must be spent to stop this problem.
In conclusion, although some people would argue there is too much attention paid to preserving wild animals and birds, I strongly believe that wildlife and birds especially endangered species should be protected as much as possible because of their vital role in human’s life.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions:• wildlife: animals, birds, insects, etc. that are wild and live in a natural environment.
Example: Development of the area would endanger wildlife.
• on the verge of extinction:
Example: Today, many animals are on the verge of extinction.
• exaggeration: a statement or description that makes something seem larger, better, worse or more important than it really is; the act of making a statement like this
Example: There was a degree of exaggeration in his description of events.
• To devote smth to smth: to give an amount of time, attention, etc. to
Example: I could only devote two hours a day to the work.
• To expend smth: to use or spend a lot of time, money, energy,
Example: She expended all her efforts on the care of home and children.
Sample Answer 1
The protection of wildlife has become a frequent subject of debate with strong arguments for and against. Personally, I believe that humans are paying too much attention and allocating too many resources to this issue, as will now be explained.
Firstly, if we allow any species to disappear, this is actually not a disaster. Some people may argue that the biology will be seriously affected if birds and wild animals are on the verge of extinction, but this is an exaggeration. Fossil evidence suggests that the mass disappearance of the dinosaur did not cause any harm to other species on the Earth but merely triggered the emergence of others such as the mammal. Therefore, we should not devote too much attention to the protection of wildlife.
Secondly, public money is limited. This means that the national budget should be allocated to more urgent issues rather than expending too much in the conservation of wild animals and birds. For example, more resources should be diverted to medical research to find out remedies for fatal diseases such as HIV and cancer, which may help to save thousands of lives in society.
Finally, the government can simply protect wildlife by continuing campaigns to raise public awareness of the protection of wildlife habitats, or impose stricter punishments on activities that may harm wild animals. Any individual who hunts wildlife for food or for pleasure should be given a heavy fine, and this may discourage them from threatening the life of wild animals.
In conclusion, while I do not refute the argument for the conservation of wildlife, I believe that it should attract less attention and fewer resources from the public.
Sample Answer 2
It is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds attract too much concerns and utilize many resources of society. Personally, I completely agreed with this idea.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why many people have paid too much attention to protect wild animals and birds. Firstly, many non-government organizations are built and expanded which express deep concern for almost animal species in a way quite unnecessarily. For instance, an animal protection organization accused Katy Perry of using the image of tigers in her own music video “ road” for commercial purposes while she did not. Secondary, nowadays the information about protecting animal receives more concerns in social network. Therefore, when a bear is hunted or suffered, immediately the news spread quickly throughout Facebook or others even though they are not aware of reasons.
On the other hand, people also have spent too many resources preserving wild birds. Any projects which are set up to save and take care for wild birds require a large amount of money. For instance, to find out a suitable DNA to protect wild birds seem quite hard, and obviously, the more difficult they meet, the more money they pay. Besides, a huge investments in wild animals and birds is quite unnecessary in some cases. Instead of spending money on such plans, people should invest in projects such as school, hospital or charity organization.
In conclusion, I would certainly agreed that many resources and attention are focused on the projection of wild animals and birds.
Sample Answer 3
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
Sample Answer 4
Many people argue that too massive effort is spent to preserve the wildlife and birds. I strongly disagree with the idea and I would argue that protecting the existence of wildlife is also saving the earth where human are inhabiting in.
To begin with, it is obvious that wild animals play as indispensable role in biology balance which distributes our living environment. The lack of any species will lead to the loss of the balance which harms our lives. Thus, the reserves designing to protect endangered species are essential. One animal living in the wild is a link of a big chain that if one link is disappeared, the whole chain will be affected. For example, if panda is extinct, their habitat such as trees or tiny animals relying on them will be affected. The whole story will lead to the unbalance environment. As a result, effort should be made in protecting rare and endangered animals.
In addition, the main reason threatens the wild definitely is human activities in the economy, construction, and beauty sectors. Human should be responsible for destroying animals’ habitat and hunting rare animals. In fact, the conservation job would be much easier if human concern more about the environment instead of doing harmful activities to the wild because of profit. For example, illegal wildlife trafficking hunt elephant for its valuable ivory which can be sold with a high price in the shadow market. To prevent this illegal action, effort must be spent to stop this problem.
In conclusion, although some people would argue there is too much attention paid to preserving wild animals and birds, I strongly believe that wildlife and birds especially endangered species should be protected as much as possible because of their vital role in human’s life.
Many people argue that too massive effort is spent to preserve the wildlife and birds. I strongly disagree with the idea and I would argue that protecting the existence of wildlife is also saving the earth where human are inhabiting in.
To begin with, it is obvious that wild animals play as indispensable role in biology balance which distributes our living environment. The lack of any species will lead to the loss of the balance which harms our lives. Thus, the reserves designing to protect endangered species are essential. One animal living in the wild is a link of a big chain that if one link is disappeared, the whole chain will be affected. For example, if panda is extinct, their habitat such as trees or tiny animals relying on them will be affected. The whole story will lead to the unbalance environment. As a result, effort should be made in protecting rare and endangered animals.
In addition, the main reason threatens the wild definitely is human activities in the economy, construction, and beauty sectors. Human should be responsible for destroying animals’ habitat and hunting rare animals. In fact, the conservation job would be much easier if human concern more about the environment instead of doing harmful activities to the wild because of profit. For example, illegal wildlife trafficking hunt elephant for its valuable ivory which can be sold with a high price in the shadow market. To prevent this illegal action, effort must be spent to stop this problem.
In conclusion, although some people would argue there is too much attention paid to preserving wild animals and birds, I strongly believe that wildlife and birds especially endangered species should be protected as much as possible because of their vital role in human’s life.
Sample Answer 5
Preserving and protecting wild lives has been a frequently discussed issue recently. Some people claim that excessive amount of resources have been spent in different protection works and the general public also paid too much attention. However, from my perspective, wild animal protection deserves such attention and resources, if not more.
To start with, the preservation work of wild lives has not reached its desired effects. Thousands of wild animals have been slaughtered or poached by some outlaws and some wild species are even facing the danger of extinction. A telling example would be a crane called Dan Ding He, a peculiar species native to China. According to a recent survey, over the past few years, the total population of this type of crane has shrunk to one fifth of its original population, which means this crane is almost on the verge of extinction. Therefore, it seems to me that other than spending too much fund or giving too much attention, our governments as well as individuals have not done enough to protect the wild lives.
Additionally, through preserving wild animals as well as their inhabitats , human beings are gaining a great deal of benefits in return. On the one hand, wild animals are interdependent on each other, striking a balance in the different forms like food chains. The existence of one wild species may account for the survival of another, and the loss of certain wild animals will probably lead to the collapse of the entire eco-system. On the other hand, living wild animals can serve a much better purpose of educating the children in terms of preserving wild lives. There is no doubt that wild animals living in their own inhabitats are more convincing in telling our offsprings the significance of protect the wild lives and our earth at large.
In conclusion, due to all the points given above, I am under the impression that we need to pool sufficient resources into the cause of protecting wild animals and the public awareness of doing this work together should be strengthened as well.
To start with, the preservation work of wild lives has not reached its desired effects. Thousands of wild animals have been slaughtered or poached by some outlaws and some wild species are even facing the danger of extinction. A telling example would be a crane called Dan Ding He, a peculiar species native to China. According to a recent survey, over the past few years, the total population of this type of crane has shrunk to one fifth of its original population, which means this crane is almost on the verge of extinction. Therefore, it seems to me that other than spending too much fund or giving too much attention, our governments as well as individuals have not done enough to protect the wild lives.
Additionally, through preserving wild animals as well as their inhabitats , human beings are gaining a great deal of benefits in return. On the one hand, wild animals are interdependent on each other, striking a balance in the different forms like food chains. The existence of one wild species may account for the survival of another, and the loss of certain wild animals will probably lead to the collapse of the entire eco-system. On the other hand, living wild animals can serve a much better purpose of educating the children in terms of preserving wild lives. There is no doubt that wild animals living in their own inhabitats are more convincing in telling our offsprings the significance of protect the wild lives and our earth at large.
In conclusion, due to all the points given above, I am under the impression that we need to pool sufficient resources into the cause of protecting wild animals and the public awareness of doing this work together should be strengthened as well.
Sample Answer 6
It has been a debatable topic that whether people should invest more money and resources in animal conservation today. Some suggest that the expenditure and resources should be spent on human society and to solve social problems. In my point of view, the investment in wildlife protection will always be worthwhile. The reasons are as follows.
Animal species have been vanishing at a much faster rate for about a century now due to human factors such as pollution, commercial overexploitation, poaching and deforestation. It doesn't matter that an animal is ugly to look at, undesirable or potentially dangerous, all animals play a role in nature and have a right to survive. Besides, different species of plants and animals make up the biodiversity within ecosystems, and everything in nature is connected. By protecting endangered animals we ensure not only their survival but also the biodiversity that is necessary for the ecological health of the planet.
Economically, there are millions individuals spend billions of dollars a year to practice "nature" activities such as mountain hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, photography, bird watching and visit to zoos or nature centers. What's more, thousands of people earn their living from flora and fauna. There's also the tourism industry, which attracts many travelers thanks to the beauty of its forests, the splendor of its mountains and the majesty of its lakes and rivers. If we do not make any effort to preserve endangered animals, the beauty of nature will be gone as well.
Furthermore, the will to protect animals and nature in general demonstrates the value of a society. And if the optimal development of our resources is a priority, it must be achieved not only economically or socially, but environmentally as well. This is the vision of sustainable development, which dictates that we use our natural resources wisely for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations.
In conclude, we must step up efforts to conserve animals and birds not only to keep the ecological balance but also to ensure that our grandchildren, like ourselves, will have the opportunity to enjoy nature in all its glory.
Sample Answer 7
Some people argue that governments and international non-governmental organizations have spent too much effort in the conservation of wildlife and birds. I strongly disagree with the idea and I would argue that protecting the existence of wildlife is also saving the earth where human are inhabiting in.
To begin with, it is obvious that wild animals play as indispensable role in biology balance which distributes our living environment. The lack of any species will lead to the loss of the balance which harms our lives. Thus, the reserves designing to protect endangered species are essential. One animal living in the wild is a link of a big chain that if one link is disappeared, the whole chain will be affected. For example, if the tiny organisms which are the main food of whales to be extinct, the whale eventually will be dead because of shortened sources of food.
In addition, the main reason threatens the wild definitely is human activities in the economy, construction, and beauty sectors. Human should be responsible for destroying animals’ habitat and hunting rare animals. In fact, the conservation job would be much easier if human concern more about the environment instead of doing harmful activities to the wild because of profit. For example, illegal wildlife trafficking hunt elephant for its valuable ivory which can be sold with a high price in the shadow market. To prevent this illegal action, effort must be spent to stop this problem.
In conclusion, although some people would argue there is too much attention paid to preserving wild animals and birds, I strongly believe that wildlife and birds especially endangered species should be protected as much as possible because of their vital role in human’s life.
Useful Vocabulary & Expressions:• wildlife: animals, birds, insects, etc. that are wild and live in a natural environment.
Example: Development of the area would endanger wildlife.
• on the verge of extinction:
Example: Today, many animals are on the verge of extinction.
• exaggeration: a statement or description that makes something seem larger, better, worse or more important than it really is; the act of making a statement like this
Example: There was a degree of exaggeration in his description of events.
• To devote smth to smth: to give an amount of time, attention, etc. to
Example: I could only devote two hours a day to the work.
• To expend smth: to use or spend a lot of time, money, energy,
Example: She expended all her efforts on the care of home and children.
Komentar
Posting Komentar