Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better.

Ini merupakan salah satu contoh Task 2 pada IELTS writing test dan berikut adalah model answers nya.

Do you agree or disagree?

Sample Answer 1

It is true that higher positions are prevalently held by aged members in many organizations these days. While some people believe younger people would demonstrate better leadership, it is in my opinion that senior managers possess more advantages over the young in leading a company.

To begin with, it is usually difficult for the young to compete with the old in terms of experience. Those who have gained adequate experience can more effectively manage to lead the individuals of an organization than those who do not. The reason for this is that business matters often require the people in charge to have not only the knowledge of coping with problematic situations but also strong nerves to calmly find a feasible solution. As a result, years of experience in a relevant position tend to make the elderly better candidates than those who are relatively young and new to the tasks.

Another advantage belonging to aged people is that they are likely to receive more support from the people in an organization. As the time spent working with the staff of the senior is often longer, they can understand their colleagues better, achieving more popularity. It is interpersonal communication skills and approval of other people that can tremendously affect the success of a leader. Younger members, on the other hand, will need more time to make contributions over time to prove themselves worthy.

In conclusion, I believe that critical positions of authority should be given to senior staff members for the certain reasons mentioned rather than the young.

Sample answer 2 

Leaders play an important role in an organisation. While people prevalently assumed old people possess more advantages in leading a company, I believe younger people are likely to reach a good leader.

On the one hand, senior people are considered to control a company for some reasons. Elder people who have contributed for ages have accumulated more experience than those who are young.So they must bring out exact and suitable plans to make success for a company.Moreover, they are looked up to and supported by almost individuals because of having strong relationship for a long time.This leads to a close-knit system within a company.

On the other hand, younger people are more suitable to take up an essential position, As this work requires to invest many talents and health, high pressure is hard for the elder people to put up with.In contrast, young people are active and have enough enthusiasm and leadership to overcome challenge.They also have chance of  coming  up with many new effective ideas with a view to enrich the company fast.

In short, while I acknowledge the ability of the old people in leading a company, I believe this necessary possition should be given to young people.

Sample answer 3 

Decision made by the leaders and initiatives taken by them often determines the fate of an organisation and that is why selecting the right people for the senior decision-making positions in a company is an important step. It is customary that employees in directorship and managerial positions often requires years of experience while some people opine that young should be given the chance to lead a company. I cannot agree with this group of people as I believe that those decision-making positions are more suitable for experienced people.

To start with, directors or managers of an organisation were not directly appointed to these positions in most of the cases. They had to work for the company for several years, prove their worth, show their loyalty, establish their credibility and express their ability to be promoted to those senior positions. With the time, they have become quite experienced and learned from their mistakes. Thus their experience and expertise have taught them when to take a risk and when not to and how to tackle complex situations like riots or rivalry from the competitors. Due to this, decisions made and initiatives taken by those senior employees are more trustworthy and proven than any inexperienced employee, no matter how energetic or innovative he is!

Furthermore, young people have endless spirit, fresh perspectives, technological know-how and innovative ideas which are more fitting for producing better output than leading others. They should be guided by senior leaders who had once been young and fresh but now have more experience than energy. To cite an example. most of the IT firms have young employees but their team leads are mostly seniors. Again, young people are often driven by emotion and make quick decisions. This might be quite handy in facing some minor issues but when a large organisation's fate is concerned, the decisions should come from experienced executives. This, however, does not mean that a manager should not listen to young employees and take input from them.

Finally, leading a small team in an organisation and being an executive director in a large company are not the same thing. Young adults who have some leadership qualities should be allowed to lead a team but major decisions making positions should be held by deserving experienced personnel.

To sum up, I am not against letting young people take some responsibilities or lead a small team. But from a more logical perspective, I believe that only experienced adults with a proven track-record should be in higher positions in an organisation.

Sample Answer 4

There seems to be a general trend towards endorsing younger leaders in business and politics these days, while some think that only the elderly can make good leaders. In this essay, I will compare and contrast two typical opinions regarding this issue.

There are reasons for some people to believe that only older people can make good leaders.

First of all, in most of the cases the old leaders whose working life is longer than the young’s age. It is the rich experience that gives the older group quite an edge. They can prove their viewpoint with case studies and practical examples of their previous professional life. On the other hand young leaders can’t counter their edge in this area. Furthermore, age can be seen as a cue for wisdom so whenever groups encounter problems that require some knowledge about norms, values and old ways of doing things (traditions) we would expect them to endorse an older leader.

But in the meantime, more young people are in managerial positions these days, which can also be found in other areas except. Nowadays many youngsters have flair in digital technology. They are so smart in internet, social media, Skype and other such stuff. That is why distant communication is no problem for them. Moreover, thanks to the wide range of knowledge on the internet they are fast learners. They take no time to learn the things which their seniors have learnt in quite a long time. More importantly, many societies undergo rapid changes currently, for instance, in technology, new resources, migrations, etcetera. That means that we want leaders who know the new ways of doing things. And indeed younger individuals come up with more creative solutions and have more fluid intelligence than older people.

In conclude, age alone is not a guarantee of success , although age and experience can reduce the risk. If the young have the talent and skills and desire to accomplish their goals, age is just a number and those young leaders can be wise beyond their years.

Sample Answer 5

It is indisputably true that most of the big organizations consist of directors, managers, operatives, trainees and the likes. A great majority of management board usually belongs to older people. Recently, some people contend that it would be better for younger staffs to shepherd the company and it has spurred an intense debate. Generally, in my point of view, both ages have the qualities of being leaders.

To begin with, it is not uncommon to witness a vast majority of leaders or directors in an organization are often taken by older people. This is due to the fact that there are some reasons elder people are the ideally appropriate of becoming a head. To be specific, the working life of old leaders normally is longer than the young people. That is to say, they would be more experienced and these invaluable experiences give them an advantage of knowing the business's functions, which cannot be underestimated. Besides that, a sense of responsibility which is often found in older people. This is utmost importance as this is needed to manage an organization efficiently and effectively.

On the other hand, some people put forward the view that the best leaders in a company should be young people. Admittedly, the lack of experience of young leaders would not be suitable for them to govern a firm, but they have other superior abilities which many senior leaders do not possess. First of all, young people are usually more up-to-date and in touch with the modern world in comparison to aged staffs. They are able to adapt easily to new technologies whereas a number of older employees are found difficult in engaging in the modern gadgets. Apart from that, young executives are more open-minded as they are willing to accept ideas. With the advent of globalization, the rapid changes faced by modern day businesses are distinctly different from the old times. In order to meet the demand of today's world, new ways of business tactics need to be devised for the sake of company.

To make the long story short, apparently age alone is not the main criteria of being a good leader. Both groups of people have their abilities to become a fine leader as long as they are able to bring profit and good reputation to the organization.

Sample Answer 6
People have different views about whether older or younger people are more suitable for important positions in organisations. While I accept that old individuals have significantly important qualities, I believe younger ones are more likely to become good leaders.
On the one hand, elderly people can be good leaders for some reasons. Firstly, as old people have worked for many years, they have accumulated much more work experience compared to younger workers. This might allow them to make wiser decisions and bring success to the company they work for. Secondly, older people are often more respected by others. Therefore, they can have a more powerful voice within the company, and people are more likely to listen to them. If leaders are young, they might find it hard to influence other employees.
On the other hand, I believe it will be better if young people take up important positions. The first reason is that since young individuals tend to be physically stronger, they can handle big responsibilities and much work. Being a leader requires people to work with much pressure, and old people are often not capable of doing that. Additionally, younger people are usually more creative, so they are more likely to find newer and better

improvements which benefit the entire organisation. For example, a young manager can come up with a new advertising strategy for a product, which contributes to the increasing sales of the company.
In conclusion, while I accept that old individuals can be good leaders of an organisation, I believe these important positions should be given to younger people.

Useful Vocabulary & Expressions

• Prevalent (adj): existing very commonly or happening often

Health problems such as obesity and diabetes are prevalent amongst young people in developing countries today.

• To demonstrate sth(v): to show or make something clear

The problems of unsatisfactory productivity which Vietnamese workers are facing demonstrate the importance of enhancing the quality of learning and teaching in tertiary education.

• Senior (adj): older

Senior family members are expected to set an example to the younger children in order that these junior members can adopt good manners in their adulthood.

• Leadership (n): the set of characteristics that make a good leader

The lack of leadership in young and inexperienced directors can sometimes put the company in jeopardy.

• Problematic (adj): difficult to deal with or to understand; full of problems; not certain to be successful

Despite acknowledging the dangers of fast food, many consumers find it problematic to switch to a healthier food choice.

• Feasible (adj): that is possible and likely to be achieved

With the public support of abandoning polluting vehicles, the prospect of the improved air quality seems more feasible.
• accumulate: to gradually get more and more of something over a period of time.
Example: Children gradually accumulate knowledge as they grow up.
• wise: sensible.
Example: a wise decision
• handle: to deal with a situation, a person, an area of work or a strong.
Example: A new man was appointed to handle the crisis.
• capable of doing something: having the ability or qualities necessary for doing something.
Example: He was barely capable of writing his own name.